Vices and Shit
(1/10)
by HotBot
(book accidentally stumbled upon by HotBot)
Editor's Note: The main characters in this book are called "Meda," "Chi," and "Jo," which together are an anagram for "I, Chode-Jam." I, Chode-Jam indeed.
Editor's Note: The main characters in this book are called "Meda," "Chi," and "Jo," which together are an anagram for "I, Chode-Jam." I, Chode-Jam indeed.
Sometimes, books make me angry. Not books in general of course—I’m talking
about specific ones. I pick them up, all
excited and ready to be bedazzled—and then I’m hit with a pile of shit instead.
It’s not what I want. Nobody Almost
nobody wants that. Such was the case
with Eliza Crewe’s “Cracked”, and it irritated me sufficiently that I asked the
gentlemen of the Piece of Shit Book ClubTM whether I could volunteer as
tribute. Just this one time.
Cracked isn’t a shit book because it’s racist. There is no fucking dinosaurs or dolphins, no
heroin-based autobiographies, no subtle pro-US propaganda. There’s not even any thinking you’re a horse. But it does check all the boxes for an unlikable and
unrelatable protagonist, a confusing target age, soooo much Bible-iness, and
some casual harassment. For a little
background, our ‘heroine’ is Andromeda Melange, half-demon soul-eater and teen
with attitude. There’s also a bunch of
people called Crusaders—virtually all of whom we meet are likewise moody teens
or invalids—and they’re at war with the Demons, while protecting people they
called ‘Beacons’. Now, I don’t want to
spoil anything, but Meda’s last name means “mixture”. Any thoughts as to what makes her so
special? Spoilers, she’s a
Crusader-Demon-Beacon. A
crudemacon. Will she choose good? Will she choose bad? Who the fuck cares, but you can guess it from
the outset if you’re so inclined.
Now, in chronological order:
The first few chapters
Meda goes psychotic and rips apart a man with her bare
hands, releases insane people into the streets, and dances in trail of blood. Despite the grizzliness, the word choice and ‘voice’
reflects perhaps a pre-teen audience, maybe the 12-14 bracket. Meda’s character is 17.
P53—Lust
Meda next encounters her first Crusaders, one of whom is Chi
(Malachi—get it? Religious! Because
all the good guys are). And because
this is apparently what pre-teens like to read in books, we get this comment
after Chi takes off his jacket: “The looks of an angel and yet all it makes me
want to do is sin.” This made me want to
look up the Bible Malachi, and we have this dude:
'Sinning' is not at the forehead of my mind. |
P71—What’s a plot
hole, anyway?!
Chi, his friend Jo, and a kid called Uri(el), are explaining
what ‘Crusaders’ are. They are like
advanced ‘Templars’ (yes, Knights Templar), and are descended from the original
Knights. But it’s not only descendants
of the ‘originals’ that have special powers: “Oh, and anyone who marries a
Templar”. That’s right. But why?
What could the reasoning be? What
is the world logic here? Meda wonders
the same thing, and asks. “They all
blink at me. Finally Uri answers, ‘Because
God says so.’”. OH. Because God
says so. Of course. What the fuck
happens in case of divorce? What if it’s
a marriage of convenience, because I hear there have been one or two of those
since the recognition of the Knights Templar in the twelfth freaking
century?! What if someone stumbles onto
your secret and starts force-marrying and divorcing you to a whole bunch of
people in order to raise some kind of super army?! And moreover, why the fuck is this important
to the story?! There’s this whole
marriage theme that runs throughout—adult Templars, for example, always fight
in pairs. And those pairs are always
couples. And 17-year-old Chi, by the end
of the book, is ‘joking’ about how he’s going to ‘make’ Jo marry him—but more
on that later on. Enough. We get it.
Jesus, God, marriage, blah. But
please oh please cover up at least the more glaring of your plot holes with
something a little more substantial.
P79—just a couple more names
Oh hey there, Ezekiel, Abraham, Methuselah and Judas. Sigh.
And this book isn’t half as endearing as the way Christian mythology is
used in Supernatural, for example. Where’s
Castiel? We all want Castiel dammit!
There are an unbelievable number of memes of this guy on the internet. |
P130—Sloth (on behalf
of the editor)
Three times in the book, words were randomly in a different
font size. I don’t know why. At first I thought it was some kind of inner
dialogue mechanism. Then I read the
sentence “no one could be that surprised”
and my internal monologue was confused.
I felt lied to. Betrayed.
P186—Gluttony (in a
very loose reference)
Meda constantly talks about her Hunger. Her hunger for food, but also her Hunger for
Souls. Or, rather, the life attached to
souls, whatever the fuck that’s supposed to mean. I assume it’s some kind of Siamese-soul
situation, and you swallow one then spit out the rest. The more I think about it, the more annoyed I
am. Meda kills a person and then sucks
out their soul, swallowing all of it.
But it’s okay, because really she only digests the ‘life’ associated
with it. So where does the rest of the soul
go?! And how are there ghosts wandering
around (one of whom has a subplot which is never resolved) with all aspects of
life, when Meda later explains that they’re only souls, no life?! Meda is called a ‘Soul-eater’ (it says so right
on the back cover!), but other Demons, ‘Real’ Demons, suck ‘life’ directly from
… some kind of afterlife? But not souls,
oh no, not souls.
Either way, on the topic of eating, I was irritated to find an overbearing
explanation of the word ‘hangry’ on page 186.
It’s like the author had just learned the word from a friend—a word
which is in fairly common use, at least where I’m from—and was excited to teach
it to the world. Give me a break.
P216—the one thing I
liked
This sentence. This
solitary sentence. “Those of us who live
with twisted bits like to think we can overcome them.” It’s with reference to somewhat-crippled Jo,
who doesn’t allow her gimpy leg (and I only say ‘gimpy’ because that’s how the
author/Meda keeps referring to her) to hold her back.
P229—what??
A reference is suddenly made to the lack of a particular
burger chain the UK. As far as we know,
the protagonist has never been to the UK, so this is just a bout of random. Is the author trying to check whether we're awake?!
P274—again with the life/soul
distinction
All right, so firstly, again with the ‘which age group is
this for’? A 13-year-old boy is tortured
to death. Lovely, right? And then we (through Meda) see his “soul,
stripped of life”, before ascending to presumably Heaven. What?
So his soul didn’t have life but was still moving on to whatever
afterlife? So it sounds like Demons aren’t
doing any harm by taking the ‘life’ from people’s souls, as they get to where
they’re going anyway. And in that case,
how the hell (yes, a pun, but an angry one) do the Demons suck life from souls
in the afterlife?! BOOK YOU MAKE NO
SENSE.
P278—oh no.
Meda meets her demon father, and she has the thought “I am such a naughty girl, aren’t I, Daddy?”. Now I don’t know if it’s just me, but I read
this and cracked up. Thank you for
backing up every ‘daddy issues’ cliché ever, Crewe. Thank you.
I’m just surprised that it didn’t devolve into some kind of
spanking/incest scene—especially given the father in question is apparently an
incubus, and that’s what they do. Or is
it only when people are asleep?
I don’t know, it’s not my bag, but the only context in which I ever
encounter someone older than around 10 using the word ‘daddy’ is in a sexual
sense, so this was just… Oh dear.
P301–327 (ie end of
book)
Chi and Jo declare their love for one another during a fight
to the death with a demon horde (man, I just do not get to type ‘demon horde’
often enough). I mean come on, if Buffy
taught us anything it’s that people say stupid things when they’re about to
die.
Buffy announces she loves him, given the apocalypse going on. Spike is like "duh, no you don't, don't be retarded". |
Then, once it’s been said, an incredible amount of the rest
of the book is taken up with the following. But
imagine Spike is Chi. Now watch the gif for
ten minutes. Now see if you feel like
punching anyone.
I was never in the Spike camp anyway, punch away. |
But does Jo go along with this? Oh no.
P310, she explains that “’I only said that because we were about to die.’” Straight-forward, right? But Chi refuses to believe it, and keeps
telling her how she loves him and she’ll be 'his'. While saying how one day her name will be ‘wife’. Meanwhile Jo keeps reiterating that “’I meant
it at the time. I thought we were going to die.’” But Chi just doesn’t take his would-be wife
that seriously—she probably doesn’t know what
she wants, that silly duffer.
Except that she does. And she's told you it's not you. |
Chi is so persistent in fact, that Jo is forced from the room,
and then in a later scene she has to run into the woods to escape him. Chi is even good enough to describe the whole
shebang as a “romantic assault”. Oh yeah
buddy, keep using words like ‘assault’ when you’re chasing some girl into the
woods. Good work. Here’s some more of Jo protesting:
“’I don’t want to talk to you anymore,’ she says in desperation. ‘I don’t want to see you ever again. Just leave me alone!’ Her voice is high-pitched and frantic.
‘Not gonna happen,’ he says easily. ‘Ever.’”
Well that’s not scary as fuck. Even Meda—half-Demon Meda—asks him what the hell he’s doing, pointing out that Jo’s getting more and more upset. On the other hand, she then lets him go run into the forest after the girl who has been forced to flee him, so maybe she’s true to her demonic nature after all.
Finally, Meda finds herself wandering through the woods, and
she comes across Chi and Jo. No, they’re
not banging. But they haven’t seen her,
so she hides in the bushes to watch them.
And watches Chi kiss Jo—while she’s
crying and protesting—and pretends to eat invisible popcorn. Oh and then suddenly the murdered kid’s ghost
appears, even though ghosts once they’re in the afterlife are meant to stay
there, because fuck plotlines.
1/10. Fuck this shit.
No comments:
Post a Comment